Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Prospective Study Using the BREAST-Q.

BACKGROUND: Poor patient-reported satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) has been associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and subsequent depression in retrospective analysis. This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the HRQOL of patients who have undergone BCT using the BREAST-Q, and to identify clinical risk factors for lower patient satisfaction. METHODS: Patients with primary breast cancer undergoing BCT were asked to complete the BREAST-Q preoperatively (T1) for baseline evaluation, then 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively (T2), and finally 1 year after surgery (T3). Clinicopathologic data were extracted from the patients' charts. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences in mean satisfaction and well-being levels among the test intervals. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for lower satisfaction. RESULTS: The study enrolled 250 patients. The lowest baseline BREAST-Q score was reported for "satisfaction with breast" (mean, 61 ± 19), but this increased postoperatively (mean, 66 ± 18) and was maintained at the 1 year follow-up evaluation (mean, 67 ± 21). "Physical well-being" decreased from T1 (mean, 82 ± 17) to T2 (mean, 28 ± 13) and did not recover much by T3 (mean, 33 ± 13), being the lowest BREAST-Q score postoperatively and in the 1-year follow-up evaluation. In multiple regression, baseline psychosocial well-being, body mass index (BMI), and type of incision were risk factors for lower "satisfaction with breasts." CONCLUSION: Both the aesthetic/surgery-related and psychological aspects are equally important with regard to "satisfaction with breasts" after BCT. The data could serve as the benchmark for future studies.

Psychometric validation of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS-12): a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) is a questionnaire to evaluate the aesthetic and functional outcome after breast conserving surgery (BCS). The original BCTOS with its 22 items on three subscales was refined to a shorter, improved, and easier to administer patient-reported outcome measure, the BCTOS-12. The BCTOS-12 consists of 12 items on two distinct subscales, the Functional Status and the Aesthetic Status. The aim of this study was to validate the BCTOS-12 in a prospective cohort. METHODS: For this study, 239 breast cancer patients were included preoperatively, and 204 patients completed the BCTOS-12 and EORTC QLQ C30 BR23 shortly after their BCS, corresponding to a follow-up rate of 85%. The item-factor structure was examined by confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability was calculated by McDonald's Omega for estimating internal consistency. The convergent validity was assessed by Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between the related scales of the questionnaires. RESULTS: The BCTOS-12 showed a robust item-factor structure and a good internal consistency with McDonald's Omega of 0.89 for the Aesthetic Status and 0.90 for the Functional Status. A high convergent and divergent validity was indicated by correlations between the subscales of the EORTC QLQ C30 BR23 and the BCTOS-12. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results demonstrate a successful psychometric validation of the BCTOS-12. The BCTOS-12 is a refined, improved, and now validated, instrument. It can be used in clinical studies and routine management for the evaluation of the aesthetic and functional outcome after BCS.

Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes - statistical and medical perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) are gaining more and more importance in the context of clinical trials. The assessment of PRO is frequently performed by questionnaires where the multiple items of a questionnaire are usually pooled within summarizing scores. These scores are used as variables to measure subjective aspects of treatments and diseases. In clinical research, the calculation of these scores is mostly kept very simple, e.g. by a simple summation of item values. In the medical literature, there is hardly any guidance for performing a refinements of questionnaires and for deducing adequate scores. In contrast, in psychometric literature, there are plenty of more sophisticated methods, which overcome typical assumptions made in traditional (sum) scores, however to the prize of more complicated algorithms, which might be difficult to communicate. When faced with the practical task to refine an existing questionnaire, there exist a clear gap of guidance for applied medical researchers. By this article we try to fill this important gap between psychometric theory and medical application by illustrating our methodological choices on the example of a clinical PRO questionnaire. METHODS: Based on our experiences with the refinement of the BCTOS, a PRO questionnaire to assess aesthetic and function after breast conserving therapy in breast cancer patients, we present the following general steps that we performed by refining the BCTOS questionnaire and its scores: 1. Refinement of the length of the questionnaire and the (item-factor) structure. 2. Selection of the factor score estimation method. 3. Validation of the refined questionnaire and scores with respect to validity, reliability and structure based on a validation cohort. RESULTS: Our step-step-step procedure helped us to shorten the current form of the BCTOS and to redefine the factor structure. By this, the compliance of patients can be increased and the interpretation of the results becomes more coherent. CONCLUSIONS: We present a step-by-step procedure to refine an existing medical questionnaire along with its scores illustrated and discussed by the refinement of the BCTOS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Due to the character of the study (no intervention study), no registration was performed.

Clinical Validation of the BREAST-Q Breast-Conserving Therapy Module.

BACKGROUND: The BREAST-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after breast surgery. The aim of this study is to test the acceptability, reliability, and validity of the most recently developed BREAST-Q module for breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in a prospective clinical cohort. METHODS: The BREAST-Q BCT module was translated into German according to international guidelines. A total of 253 women with primary breast cancer undergoing BCT were recruited preoperatively. This study evaluated the BREAST-Q BCT subscales by using psychometric methods including acceptability, reliability, and validity. To examine construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity were determined by testing the instrument's scales against the EORTC C30 and BR23 as reference questionnaires. RESULTS: Acceptability was supported by a high follow-up rate (90%) and low frequency of missing data (< 10%) in all but three scales. Scale reliability was supported by high Cronbach's alpha coefficients (> 0.86) and item-total correlations (range of means, 0.33-0.89). Validity was shown by convergent and divergent correlations. The hypotheses of relationships between the scales of the BREAST-Q and the EORTC QLQ C30 BR23 revealed moderate to high correlations. CONCLUSIONS: The BREAST-Q BCT module proved to be an accepted, reliable, and valid questionnaire for the assessment of HRQOL and patient satisfaction after BCT in breast cancer patients. It can be recommended as a possible standard PROM for individual clinical analysis, quality assessment, and future trials.